3 ms·
That was a shockingly controlled landing for an unpowered vehicle. Very impressive! > Here you go - drops slightly slower than a brick. The glide ratio of a b
by nerdsniper 2mo ago
That was a shockingly controlled landing for an unpowered vehicle. Very impressive!
> Here you go - drops slightly slower than a brick.
The glide ratio of a brick, even if it is initially traveling at 80 KIAS is ... 0:1. This is the same glide ratio that an unpowered quadcopter would have. Bell 206B, Robinson R44, and R22 all list their unpowered autorotation glide ratios at 4:1 - that is a mathematically infinite multiplier of performance vs. a brick.
https://robinsonstrapistorprod.blob.core.windows.net/uploads/assets/r22_poh_full_book_b79e920713.pdf https://robinsonstrapistorprod.blob.core.windows.net/uploads...
- ButlerianJihad 2mo agoThe Space Shuttle orbiter was nicknamed “Flying Brick” in its landing configuration by the astronauts and test pilots, because even for a glider, it had the worst maneuverability they had ever experienced, not to mention the highest approach velocity and catastrophic failure modes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Training_Aircraft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Training_Aircraft