3 ms·
So this is a competitor to something like OpenCode or Pi? I suspect for most developers, they are using Claude Code or Codex CLI mainly just so they don't have
by daveidol 2mo ago
So this is a competitor to something like OpenCode or Pi? I suspect for most developers, they are using Claude Code or Codex CLI mainly just so they don't have to pay-per-token and can use the subscription products - which I assume can't be done with Warp Agent?
- Instantnoodl 2mo agoThe codex and many other subscriptions can be used with other harnesses like OpenCode and pi. It's officially supported most of the time. Using my Codex and MiniMax sub just fine in pi.
- ac29 2mo agoYeah Anthropic is the only company I am aware of that only allows subscription usage in first party products
- brandall10 2mo agoGoogle as well.
- madeofpalk 2mo agoI suspect most developers don’t care too much about cost because they’re just using what their company is just paying for whatever enterprise subscription/billing.
- 9dev 2mo agoWell someone (like me) has to make the decision what their developers get to use, and that was in fact informed by subscription pricing vs. API cost.
- bholmesdev 2mo agoWarp engineer here - yes, you can use OpenCode or Pi as comparison points; our CLI has BYOK, Supergrok subscription support, or our own inference to connect to frontier / open weight. The main reason you might try it is the shell access. We made CLI commands runnable in an agent session in the foreground, similar to our terminal agent. It means you can `cd` into different directories during the session, or run interactive commands like vim or REPLs in the session. One reason is convenience (it's nicer to cd around projects and keep the conversation going) and another is visibility (you can run a REPL in the foreground and tag in an agent to help and control that REPL). We're curious how others like working this way. It's pretty convenient.