3 ms·
> You have no idea what fraction of their techniques they're not publishing, and how much they contribute to their model performance, because you cannot replica
by HarHarVeryFunny 3mo ago
> You have no idea what fraction of their techniques they're not publishing, and how much they contribute to their model performance, because you cannot replicate the models, because they don't publish their training data.
Why would you be concerned about THEIR model performance ?!
Surely if you are an ML researcher and read about a new technique, you are interested in how YOU may be able to use it.
If you are Ilya Sutskever sitting at OpenAI in 2017, and happen upon Google's "attention" (Transformer architecture) paper, then what you do is go and implement it for yourself, get yourself some training data, and try it.
What you are NOT going to do is whine about not being given their source code, or their training data, or their training harness, or a dump of Google's corporate secrets. You take the research that has been shared and evaluate it for yourself.
- throw10920 3mo agoThis doesn't have anything to do with Google or OpenAI. I'm not Ilya Sutskever and it's not 2017, either. I'm not "whining" about anything. You made the claim "The Chinese have actually been very open about training" and I showed that that was false. That's all that there is to it.
- HarHarVeryFunny 3mo agoThe rest of the word is reading Chinese published research and benefiting from it. Apparently you are unaware of it and not benefiting from it. Oh well.