4 ms·
You have the same issue with the conventional bombs and their guidance kits, which when delivered in contested areas are not usually cheaper. The issue is gene
by closewith 2mo ago
You have the same issue with the conventional bombs and their guidance kits, which when delivered in contested areas are not usually cheaper.
The issue is general industrial capacity, not missiles specifically.
- throwthrowuknow 2mo agoThe issue is restraint, an all out bombing campaign with no regard for civilians or international condemnation would do the job in a month
- closewith 2mo agoI think it takes a wilful ignorance of the history of industrialised warfare to believe this.
- budman1 2mo agoJDAM's are a lot cheaper. They are a guidance kit bolted on to a MK-82 gravity bomb. There are a lot of MK-82's in stock, as they have been made since the 1940's. Problem is you put a crew and an expensive airplane at risk. We are out of missiles because the current administration wants to minimize combat losses. Looking at the dollar cost; it seems like a bad idea. But is this war worth any of our soldiers / sailors / airman ? (no)
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- greedo 2mo agoAlso, you can jam JDAM (GPS) guidance. The Russians are masters at jamming and I'm fairly confident they've shared some systems with Iran.