3 ms·
>In all cases they do not have permission to use the data for their own purposes Oh, they don't have permission? probably fine then.
by jpfromlondon 2mo ago
>In all cases they do not have permission to use the data for their own purposes
Oh, they don't have permission? probably fine then.
- Oras 2mo agoInsert "this is fine" meme
- andrewstuart 2mo agoDefinitely fine. All the Palantir employees have read that clause of course. In Australia when the biggest health insurer had ALL patient records stolen, the Board of Directors immediately granted themselves very large cash bonuses (true).
- oliwarner 2mo agoWhile I agree, permission still means something. If they're found to have held onto it, processed it or shared it, they'll be told off very sternly and asked politely to not do it again.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo agoSternly? Hey hey hey, let's not go overboard here.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- tcp_handshaker 2mo agoThey are sharing it with several other customers of theirs but in a smart way, pretending is done via discovery of their ontology tool and for other countries also... You heard it here first. I realized this by talking to several recently hired graduates at several startups. I was shocked at the amount of startups spending money on Palantir. It seems right now, every dumb founder with no idea or market fit, and a lot of dumb money is buying their tools. There is a spending AI bubble, and then there is a parallel mini Palantir buy bubble...