4 ms·
>Nope, they do it primarily out of necessity, because of the mounting pressure on the previously used CAs. The MitM capability is just a nice side bonus. So th
by drysine 2mo ago
>Nope, they do it primarily out of necessity, because of the mounting pressure on the previously used CAs. The MitM capability is just a nice side bonus.
So the West essentially helps Kremlin to control Russian citizens. Why is that? Incompetence or something else?
- inigyou 2mo agoAllowing Russia to have a TLD is also helping the Kremlin control Russian citizens. Do you recommend that IANA should delete the .ru domain?
- drysine 2mo agoHow so?
- inigyou 2mo agoit lets them have websites, where they can impose controls via the internet, obviously. Should we delete .ru?
- drysine 2mo agoYou are not making sense. What controls? They can only ban your domain name and if they do that, you already have a bigger problem. It's not a surprise for you, you used you passport when registering the domain name and if you planned to do something Kremlin wouldn't like you could've registered it via a foreign registrar and used foreign hosting. Contrarily, when you have to install Kremlin's root certificate to access your bank, you are unwittingly allowing Kremlin to quietly MitM any connection you make (without them specifically targeting you) and to avoid that you need: - to be aware of the problem, - to install those certs in a separate browser or on a separate device which you'd use only to visit your bank and state services
- wartywhoa23 2mo agoJust some Nanay Boys wrestling. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztstTo3dVp4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztstTo3dVp4