2 ms·
It is not. One of their employees wrote the prompt and hit Enter. Employee is liable for not telling boss he can't guarantee behavior doing this. N-1 layers of
by salawat 2mo ago
It is not. One of their employees wrote the prompt and hit Enter.
Employee is liable for not telling boss he can't guarantee behavior doing this. N-1 layers of management inaccurately assessed and mismanaged the reasonably foreseeable risk. Literally the only one not culpable in the entire chain is the machine itself.
Appeals to "It's complicated" constitute the crumple zone desired by people who really need the aforestated to not be the case to keep being paid.
- ticulatedspline 2mo agoSo you're saying the employee who hit enter is legally liable?
- wmf 2mo agoThe company is liable because the employee was acting on behalf of the company.
- salawat 2mo agoThis. Outside in, company is liable. Internally speaking, everyone from the employee, up the management chain has culpability for not mitigating a reasonably foreseeable risk. As it turns out, if you hold people to an standard of reasonable forseeability, and don't let them set the goalposts at 2nd degree arbitrarily, there isn't much you can actually get away with. The steps aren't hard to manage when you actually take the time to think about them.