3 ms·
Gary doesn't argue it's hype though. He argues 2 things: other people are getting carried away with the result, and we don't know enough about how it was reache
by afro88 2mo ago
Gary doesn't argue it's hype though. He argues 2 things: other people are getting carried away with the result, and we don't know enough about how it was reached to know where it falls on the impressive scale.
He literally says it's an impressive feat in the second article.
- overgard 2mo ago> other people are getting carried away with the result That is the intended purpose of hype. He's polite, but he's basically saying there's potentially a lot of smoke and mirrors. I agree.