3 ms·
Some people even claim that they don't commit the code into source control, only the prompts. The best part about the internet is that you can publish any rando
by raincole 2mo ago
Some people even claim that they don't commit the code into source control, only the prompts. The best part about the internet is that you can publish any random shower thought.
- CamperBob2 2mo agoAround 2020 I started getting downvoted for predicting that while the most popular programming languages at the time were Python, Java, and JavaScript, or whatever they were, the most popular programming languages in 2035 would be English and Mandarin. Looks more like 2030, after all. So the downvoters had a point.
- jeremyjh 2mo agoI think having some real examples of this 2035 is a lot more feasible now than it would have looked to most people in 2020, but the majority of projects in 2030 is absurd. Can you name even one piece of software today that is actually built this way? This means: Every release, the only thing done is they edit a prompt and then ship the build that comes out of LLM -> CI/CD ? Then they delete all the source that was generated, along with the context, and only the prompt is carried forward to the next release?
- CamperBob2 2mo agoWhat I'm talking about has only become possible in the last few months. Within a year you'll start to see new products built this way. Within five years you will see very few new products built any other way. Today's source code is tomorrow's object code.
- inigyou 2mo agoI don't even commit the prompts. I just commit the one prompt which says "do what the customer wants. ask when more information is required."