3 ms·
You’re quoting someone else’s speech. The quotation is your speech, but the literal words were not. I’m actually fine with the idea that people are quoting LLM
by lovich 2mo ago
You’re quoting someone else’s speech. The quotation is your speech, but the literal words were not.
I’m actually fine with the idea that people are quoting LLMs but there’s this conflation I find many people where they treat the LLMs output as their own literal thoughts.
The language around this distinction is clunky currently so if you meant the former point I agree, but I had interpreted the comment I was responding to as the latter.
- mock-possum 2mo ago> The quotation is your speech, but the literal words were not ... I’m actually fine with the idea that people are quoting LLMs yeah this I agree with and am familiar with, and I guess I'm guilty of just assuming that this is what people are talking about when they say that LLM-generated stuff is their own speech - because, > people where they treat the LLMs output as their own literal thoughts just seems like a different issue altogether. lying about the provenance of something isn't a matter of speech, it's a matter of - I don't know, deception / dishonesty. It's like a separate issue. very interesting that we both sort of saw it different ways though.