4 ms·

> We are now at the point where RSI is feasible What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. - Hitchen's Razor

• apetresc 3mo ago
  The evidence is abundant and nearly impossible to ignore without increasingly focused effort.
  • bigyabai 3mo ago
    So abundant that you won't link anything? Send a peer-reviewed paper then, let's settle this.
    • apetresc 3mo ago
      You need a "peer-reviewed paper" to believe that frontier labs are increasingly using agentic workflows to develop frontier models?
• kypro 3mo ago
  Did you read the article? AI is a math & computer science problem. If AI can do advanced maths and computer science research, then it can begin to suggest useful algorithmic optimisations. Right now I'm sure the vast majority of these will be junk, but occasionally, even with current limitations, they might occasionally stumble on something. It's not really whether RSI is or isn't possible, it's really just whether it's the most efficient way for labs to improve their models today given they have limited compute to run AI-generated experiments and access to very intelligent humans who might have a better hit/miss ratio. Do you disagree with anything I'm saying here? Do you not think current AIs can suggest algorithmic improvements or something?