4 ms·
How would 100% non-human code possibly be safer?
by LetsGetTechnicl 2mo ago
How would 100% non-human code possibly be safer?
- micromacrofoot 2mo agowell if driving is supposedly safer when automated, why not code
- ModernMech 2mo agoIt’s supposedly safer than the average driver, not safer than professional drivers.
- micromacrofoot 2mo agothe average american spends 60 minutes a day driving, that's thousands of hours by the time you reach 25... at what point is that not a professional level of experience?
- dd8601fn 2mo agoThe qualities of computation that make autopilots safer than human drivers aren’t the same qualities that produce better designed software products.
- micromacrofoot 2mo agoto err is human
- LetsGetTechnicl 2mo agoIs it actually safer? If you can't understand the code you can't verify it's safety, and AI code often has bugs in it. You can't trust implicitly.
- skeledrew 2mo agoYou don't need to understand code to verify its safety if you have a good QA framework.
- micromacrofoot 2mo agoSame applies to driving cars