5 ms·

Explosive diarrhea doesn’t take long to show up, and it may be hard to identify which company or who’s responsible when you fired all of the people from the dep

by Danox 3mo ago

Explosive diarrhea doesn’t take long to show up, and it may be hard to identify which company or who’s responsible when you fired all of the people from the department that it’s supposed to police those type of things.

godwinson__4-8 3mo ago
Isn't the "explosive" superfluous? Isn't all diarrhea explosive? Has anyone had "unexplosive" diarrhea? Or what aspect of the ordinance renders it "explosive"? And the cause is essentially exposure of the foodstuffs (in this case, likely leafy greens) to feces? So poop causes poop. Who pooped in my salad :(
- hightrix 3mo ago
  As an IBS enjoyer, no, not all diarrhea is explosive.
- Tostino 3mo ago
  No, from what I have heard "explosive" isn't being treated with enough weight. Not all diarrhea is "explosive". This is worse than your average food poisoning from everything i've read (luckily, no personal experience so far).
  - godwinson__4-8 3mo ago
    >No, from what I have heard "explosive" isn't being treated with enough weight. Hmm I had not heard this, that is concerning. Thank you for sharing. No more salad for me, thanks.
- dgellow 3mo ago
  No, it’s actually one of the symptom, it is described as explosive, not a standard diarrhea
- fsloth 3mo ago
  To me "explosive" means it comes unannounced and evacuates bowels within few seconds, ovepowering any sphincter resistance. If that's your normal poop maybe seek medical advice.
- Anamon 2mo ago
  "I just know it gives you really, really bad diarrhea." -- "As opposed to really, really good diarrhea?" (Bob's Burgers)
ssl-3 3mo ago
It seems that cyclospora normally averages about a week between ingestion and making its presence known. This is, in my opinion, something that qualifies as being a long time.
nomel 3mo ago
They fired 8 people that were in response roles, not preventative.
- daveguy 3mo ago
  So.... Exactly the people they need right now?
  - nomel 3mo ago
    Yes, it's what they need right now. No it would not have prevented anything, as the comment I was responding to implied.
    - daveguy 2mo ago
      Parent of your response: > ...may be hard to identify which company or who’s responsible when you fired all of the people from the department that it’s supposed to police those type of things. You responded to a post quite literally about identifying sources, which is exactly what a response team does. Maybe you respondrd to the wrong post?

by Danox 3mo ago

godwinson__4-8 3mo ago

Isn't the "explosive" superfluous? Isn't all diarrhea explosive? Has anyone had "unexplosive" diarrhea? Or what aspect of the ordinance renders it "explosive"? And the cause is essentially exposure of the foodstuffs (in this case, likely leafy greens) to feces? So poop causes poop. Who pooped in my salad :(

hightrix 3mo ago
As an IBS enjoyer, no, not all diarrhea is explosive.
Tostino 3mo ago
No, from what I have heard "explosive" isn't being treated with enough weight. Not all diarrhea is "explosive". This is worse than your average food poisoning from everything i've read (luckily, no personal experience so far).
- godwinson__4-8 3mo ago
  >No, from what I have heard "explosive" isn't being treated with enough weight. Hmm I had not heard this, that is concerning. Thank you for sharing. No more salad for me, thanks.
dgellow 3mo ago
No, it’s actually one of the symptom, it is described as explosive, not a standard diarrhea
fsloth 3mo ago
To me "explosive" means it comes unannounced and evacuates bowels within few seconds, ovepowering any sphincter resistance. If that's your normal poop maybe seek medical advice.
Anamon 2mo ago
"I just know it gives you really, really bad diarrhea." -- "As opposed to really, really good diarrhea?" (Bob's Burgers)

ssl-3 3mo ago

It seems that cyclospora normally averages about a week between ingestion and making its presence known. This is, in my opinion, something that qualifies as being a long time.

nomel 3mo ago

They fired 8 people that were in response roles, not preventative.

daveguy 3mo ago
So.... Exactly the people they need right now?
- nomel 3mo ago
  Yes, it's what they need right now. No it would not have prevented anything, as the comment I was responding to implied.
  - daveguy 2mo ago
    Parent of your response: > ...may be hard to identify which company or who’s responsible when you fired all of the people from the department that it’s supposed to police those type of things. You responded to a post quite literally about identifying sources, which is exactly what a response team does. Maybe you respondrd to the wrong post?