4 ms·
Make a case then. My case is that Greg has, for decades, said that he hates the CVE system and rejected it and that the kernel objectively labels CVEs based on
by insanitybit 2mo ago
Make a case then. My case is that Greg has, for decades, said that he hates the CVE system and rejected it and that the kernel objectively labels CVEs based on fixes (not the standard at all, CVEs are for vulns), etc. I can point to so many objective pieces of evidence to support my claim.
You seem to have a vague, leading question. If you want to say something about "other groups" or ideologies, go ahead.
- inigyou 2mo agoMalicious compliance is compliance.
- insanitybit 2mo agoI don't know what you're trying to say at all. But no, the kernel is objectively not compliant because they label fixes with CVEs and not vulnerabilities. But even if they were compliant... what would that have to do with anything? Feels like a non sequitur. It's very hard to figure out what point you're trying to make.
- inigyou 2mo agoEvery bugfix implies a bug.
- insanitybit 2mo agoI'm going to graciously give you one last chance to actually say something of substance before I stop responding entirely.