3 ms·
"Gemin" I'd support an argument to bring back the "I" to computing. The gem in I. Perhaps humans need their own APIs for others to then mash-up in the way they
by adrianwaj 2mo ago
"Gemin" I'd support an argument to bring back the "I" to computing. The gem in I.
Perhaps humans need their own APIs for others to then mash-up in the way they please?
For example, I think the goal is to merge all entry fields into a local one that manages and monitors output. I should be able to see and record a stream of everything I do online but I can't. That stream, being a representation of me, is what's valuable. Straits of Hormuz on a person-by-person basis.
How many entry fields are there that you use? email, video, social, crypto, HN, chat, apps... the list goes on. There's a lot of duplicated effort there. Why so many?
I think the whole "One device to rule them all" that I mentioned here [1] is about putting a layer around yourself and letting others interface with you on your terms.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48912226 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48912226
local-first >> individual first