4 ms·
This is the slippery slope fallacy and people in tech seem to love this argument. And you can argue in whichever direction you want with it. For example, "unfe
by jmyeet 3mo ago
This is the slippery slope fallacy and people in tech seem to love this argument. And you can argue in whichever direction you want with it.
For example, "unfettered Internet access is just a series of tubes (shout out to Ted Stevens for that one) for pedophiles to rape your children." So now what? Is it your hyperbole against mine?
The problem is that people are operating under a myth that they have anonymity. You don't. You're one subpoena away from being unmasked online and individuals can do it (eg [1]). When governments do it, they can do it in secret. National Security Letters, pen registers, FISA warrants, etc.
So the idea that "age verification is the first step to a more comprehensive" is flawed in both logical construction (being a fallacy) and that ship has already sailed.
[1]: https://chambers.com/articles/internet-harassment-lawyer https://chambers.com/articles/internet-harassment-lawyer
- xg15 3mo agoBut in this case, the slipping just happened. This thread is about how an app that will be required for using a vast fraction of all websites will require hardware attestation and likely only run on closed, non-rooted mobile OSes. That's not a hypothetical scenario, it's literally what this thread is about.
- throw-the-towel 2mo agoMaybe it's reasonable to argue a slope is slippery if you've just seen someone lubricate it.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]