4 ms·
Sounds like an opportunity then for you to create a competing company that functions the way you feel it should function. If that's what people value, you'll ta
by thegrim33 2mo ago
Sounds like an opportunity then for you to create a competing company that functions the way you feel it should function. If that's what people value, you'll take all the business since you're the only one offering it.
- EA-3167 2mo agoWhat people value is subject to marketing and long-term manipulation, not to mention a poverty of competition.
- darth_avocado 2mo ago> Sounds like an opportunity then for you to create a competing company that functions the way you feel it should function Sure, if one has millions and millions in capital. Because why would an investor put a money in my company that works the way it “should” according to me if it produces lower profits as compared to my competitors?
- lotsofpulp 2mo agoBecause buyers choose to spend less money, so if a business comes around that can offer the same product/service at a lower price, the investor will want to own a piece of that business rather than the one that is about to lose buyers.
- saghm 2mo agoRight, because we never see investors making decisions that are suboptimal in the long term because they're too focused on short-term gains. Everyone is perfectly rational, and high initial costs have never discouraged anyone from trying to displace an established dominant player; it's purely because the dominant players are perfectly efficient and don't ever try to rent-seek.
- lotsofpulp 2mo agoI did not claim any of that, so not sure if your reply is misplaced. It’s an easily observable fact that throughout the previous decades, investors have invested in businesses that reduce profit margins. Amazon being one of the most famous with the slogan “your margin is my opportunity”, but also Walmart, Costco, and other businesses that end up winning because they delivered acceptable products or services at lower prices.
- saghm 2mo agoNo, my reply was not replaced. You were replaying to a thread where someone was told that they should start a competing business to Microsoft to displace the Xbox, and when the obvious response of how much money was needed to start such a business, you replied with a hand-waved explanation of how investors would be interested if it would eventually lead to a return on investment. You said something that was not technically incorrect in a vacuum but completely ignored the context behind what the person was actually asking, so I was pointing out why your response wasn't particularly relevant or helpful. I understand that you weren't the one who initially claimed they should start a business, but if you're going to jump into a thread where someone is told something nonsensical and defend the nonsense by ignoring the context, it's reasonable for others to also jump in and call that out.
- inigyou 2mo agoThere are reasons people don't start businesses. Besides all the regulations, there's the constant struggle to pay rent.
- ozgrakkurt 2mo agoYou have to be delusional if you think you are in that class that can spin up an xbox competitor
- ndriscoll 2mo agoDidn't Nex Playground pretty much just do that? I saw them on display last time I went to Costco, and they apparently outsold Xbox during last year's Black Friday sales.
- ozgrakkurt 2mo agoThis is super cool, didn't see this before. Not 100% sure how much this applies but maybe I'm wrong