39 ms·
>I don't want to know things without learning them I lives in this world, but we live in a society. While you may diligently learn, there will be 10+ more that
by pixl97 3mo ago
>I don't want to know things without learning them
I lives in this world, but we live in a society. While you may diligently learn, there will be 10+ more that won't and will use the AI like an oracle. It then comes up how much damage will become of this.
And we're not even in the era of rampant agentic AI spreading itself around and the fun and neat problems that will cause.
- mannanj 3mo agoWhat's the necessary thing here that people need to "learn" to prevent the hypothetical AI damage scenario you are talking about?
- pixl97 3mo agoEh, well, stop building AI. We're not going to do that, so it's pretty much unavoidable. If I had to make a "most probable guess" of what the future looks like, we'll have some kind of AI mess caused that will cost billion of dollars. This will get governments up in a tizzy about their dangers, while still being hopelessly addicted to them in military and tracking their citizens. Most people think that governments will attack the models being built, but I don't think so, they want powerful models mostly for themselves. So they'll go after the next best thing. Hardware. What exactly that looks like, I'm not sure, but the big clusters of the machines will have to be registered and licensed. Likely the models will have to be encoded to run on particular hardware and getting caught with an unencoded model would be considered an illegal munition, like we did with cryptography in the past.
- mannanj 3mo agoAm I hearing this right: - people will use AI bad - because people will use AI bad, stop building it