3 ms·

> The absence of masculinization is not feminization, and the absence of feminization is not masculinization. It is, to a certain degree. An man/woman who didn

by cubefox 3mo ago

> The absence of masculinization is not feminization, and the absence of feminization is not masculinization. It is, to a certain degree. An man/woman who didn't develop several of their respective sex traits will automatically appear more feminine/masculine because these are polar opposites.

foco_tubi 3mo ago
That is entirely subjective, from a biological standpoint you couldn’t be more wrong
- cubefox 3mo ago
  Quite the contrary, it makes perfect biological sense for all kinds of sexually dimorphic animals.
  - foco_tubi 3mo ago
    Perhaps it makes sense to you, but I’m not surprised by that at this point