3 ms·
> and the early popularity and widespread adoption of RSS, the better format (atom) isn't used nearly as much. That may have been true 20 years ago, but now th
by stymaar 2mo ago
> and the early popularity and widespread adoption of RSS, the better format (atom) isn't used nearly as much.
That may have been true 20 years ago, but now that pretty much no-one uses either of them , I'd be surprised if RSS was still meaningfully more widespread than Atom. (Except everything is being called RSS).
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141336 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141336 is the only valid response to your VHS/Betamax comparison, really.
- verisimi 2mo agoI use RSS multiple times daily.
- stymaar 2mo agoAnd you're also on HN, you're not exactly the average human being. Do you use “RSS” as a protol specifically, or do you use “RSS” as in “any feed no matter the protocol”?
- verisimi 2mo agoI was responding to the generic comment that: > pretty much no-one uses either of them
- stymaar 2mo agoAnd I stand with that phrase. I'm pretty sure that are more VHS users than RSS these days. It's not strictly zero, but it's a negligible fraction of internet users.
- superkuh 2mo agoI don't disagree. But I would also assert the absolute number of RSS users is probably higher than it has ever been. And that's what matters, not what "most people do" now that there are far more non-technical users on the internet than ever before.
- kelnos 2mo agoOne person using something doesn't mean it's popular.
- talideon 2mo agoWell, the likes of Wordpress make this a bit of a mixed bag. It still publishes multiple feeds in multiple format, with what proports to being an RSS feed actually being a Frankenstein's monster of RSS, Atom, and random other namespaces. I don't know why they persist in still doing that after all these years.