3 ms·
To "solve it" would require either a single counter example disproving the claim, or a proof that the conjecture about the Riemann zeta function is true. If Op
by defrost 3mo ago
To "solve it" would require either a single counter example disproving the claim, or a proof that the conjecture about the Riemann zeta function is true.
If OpenAI claimed the conjecture to be true but provided no details about the proof then the first comment should absolutely be about lack of transparency.
- simianwords 3mo ago> no details about the proof do you really imagine a scenario where OpenAI would claim to solve it and not give details about the proof? how is this even possible? why would anyone believe them?