2 ms·
Brother I already conceded that money is somewhat important but it is missing forest for the trees. If OpenAI solved Reimanns hypothesis and the first comment
by simianwords 3mo ago
Brother I already conceded that money is somewhat important but it is missing forest for the trees.
If OpenAI solved Reimanns hypothesis and the first comment is says something about lack of transparency and marketing, i would say it’s ignorant.
- defrost 3mo agoTo "solve it" would require either a single counter example disproving the claim, or a proof that the conjecture about the Riemann zeta function is true. If OpenAI claimed the conjecture to be true but provided no details about the proof then the first comment should absolutely be about lack of transparency.
- simianwords 3mo ago> no details about the proof do you really imagine a scenario where OpenAI would claim to solve it and not give details about the proof? how is this even possible? why would anyone believe them?