3 ms·
Crank author at a crank “institution” - I can’t assess whether the OpenAI paper is accurate but I highly doubt this is going to be the paper to disprove it.
by mikeyouse 2mo ago
Crank author at a crank “institution” - I can’t assess whether the OpenAI paper is accurate but I highly doubt this is going to be the paper to disprove it.
- startigerjen 2mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- MoonUnit97 2mo agoUniversity of Kansas is not a crank institution. So she directs a hybrid thinktank that's experience not anything crazy. Other physicists are citing her work: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00885 https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00885 She's no hack.
- gus_massa 2mo agoIs this published in a serious peer review journal? The Arxiv has a very los publishing barrier.
- MoonUnit97 2mo agoShe is submitting to serious peer reviewed journals. She has released preprints which she is subjecting to community scrutiny. Since the AI papers were released without peer review it was important to address and peer review as a community very quickly