3 ms·
His earlier 32bit book was pretty decent, but super windows focused, I wish a similar work using a reasonable syntax existed for Linux, but the linux equivalent
by gregdaniels421 2mo ago
His earlier 32bit book was pretty decent, but super windows focused, I wish a similar work using a reasonable syntax existed for Linux, but the linux equivalent(some kind of foundations of programming or something similar assembly book) used gas syntax which is like nails on a chalkboard. Fasm is also so much nicer these days to use(masm is neglected by microsoft, but is the tool the author has used for everything).
- tmtvl 2mo ago> gas syntax which is like nails on a chalkboard That's weird, GNU as should default to AT&T syntax. Maybe the author switched to Intel syntax by adding the .intel_syntax directive at the beginning of the code?
- fuzztester 2mo agoHave you checked out paul carters assembly language book. it is free online. i'm not sure it has stuff for Linux.But you can check. also , it may be , for sixteen or thirty two bit. since I noticed it online long back. sorry voice typing. Edit: i checked. it is for 32 bit. works on Linux. and uses Nasm. https://pacman128.github.io/pcasm/ https://pacman128.github.io/pcasm/