3 ms·

I suggest replacing google's News tab with Magic! because it's so heavily messed with you cannot make sense of the ranking. For some queries on ongoing events I

I suggest replacing google's News tab with Magic! because it's so heavily messed with you cannot make sense of the ranking. For some queries on ongoing events I've seen headlines come up from the last month or older as the first result. How hard you mofos want to suppress information?

nomel 2mo ago
[flagged]
- alex1138 2mo ago
  [flagged]
  - chasd00 2mo ago
    HN was no better. It sticks in my memory because how shocked and saddened I was at the suppression here too. You can back through old threads during the pandemic and see for yourself. A good search would just be “Sweden” because sweden’s reasoning on lockdowns was especially triggering to HN for some reason.
    - alex1138 2mo ago
      [flagged]
- procone 2mo ago
  Maybe because there was nothing to surface besides media panic? Here's a study you probably won't read because science is somehow political these days. Hint: the numbers are a rounding error given 10MM doses. Myocarditis following COVID‐19 vaccine https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9538893/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9538893/
- inigyou 2mo ago
  Occam's razor: maybe there isn't a conspiracy to suppress true information, but rather, maybe that information is just wrong and stupid.
  - alex1138 2mo ago
    Not really. The scientific consensus is that the mainstream view of covid was dead wrong
    - inigyou 2mo ago
      The what? How can the scientific consensus not be the mainstream view?
      - alex1138 2mo ago
        It was sloppy wording, sorry. But there were plenty of scientists saying this is ridiculous Given the timing - you wouldn't be the one who flagged all those comments, would you?
        inigyou 2mo ago
        There are scientists saying God is real
        alex1138 2mo ago
        https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
  - nomel 2mo ago
    Again, it would be useful for down voters to follow up, especially since google admitted wrong and agrees with me about their censorship https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong-google-admits-to-censoring-covid-content-under-pressure-from-biden-administration/ https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong... The vaccine now includes myocarditis as a known risks. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/fda-approves-required-updated-warning-labeling-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-regarding-myocarditis-and https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availabi... Causing the stocks to slide when the link was made https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/vaccine-stocks-slide-as-fda-official-links-covid-vaccines-and-heart-conditions-in-young-men/ar-AA1RvBn1 https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/vaccine-stocks-slide-... With the mechanism probably understood now https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-vaccine-covid.html https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-v... Is the risk severe? No. But nothing that I saw removed suggested it was so, just higher in young men. The risk ended up being real, but they removed studies from universities and articles from hospitals/doctors, based on vibes from an administration, rather than science https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong-google-admits-to-censoring-covid-content-under-pressure-from-biden-administration/ https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong... I was especially interested in it all because I lost significant use of my arm for 2 months after a too-deep injection. The concept of incorrect injections, like into the blood stream (an untested/unapproved method, prevented by aspiration which was not done/prevented, as policy), was interesting to me, which also was all removed.

nomel 2mo ago

[flagged]

alex1138 2mo ago
[flagged]
- chasd00 2mo ago
  HN was no better. It sticks in my memory because how shocked and saddened I was at the suppression here too. You can back through old threads during the pandemic and see for yourself. A good search would just be “Sweden” because sweden’s reasoning on lockdowns was especially triggering to HN for some reason.
  - alex1138 2mo ago
    [flagged]
procone 2mo ago
Maybe because there was nothing to surface besides media panic? Here's a study you probably won't read because science is somehow political these days. Hint: the numbers are a rounding error given 10MM doses. Myocarditis following COVID‐19 vaccine https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9538893/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9538893/
inigyou 2mo ago
Occam's razor: maybe there isn't a conspiracy to suppress true information, but rather, maybe that information is just wrong and stupid.
- alex1138 2mo ago
  Not really. The scientific consensus is that the mainstream view of covid was dead wrong
  - inigyou 2mo ago
    The what? How can the scientific consensus not be the mainstream view?
    - alex1138 2mo ago
      It was sloppy wording, sorry. But there were plenty of scientists saying this is ridiculous Given the timing - you wouldn't be the one who flagged all those comments, would you?
      - inigyou 2mo ago
        There are scientists saying God is real
        alex1138 2mo ago
        https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
- nomel 2mo ago
  Again, it would be useful for down voters to follow up, especially since google admitted wrong and agrees with me about their censorship https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong-google-admits-to-censoring-covid-content-under-pressure-from-biden-administration/ https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong... The vaccine now includes myocarditis as a known risks. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/fda-approves-required-updated-warning-labeling-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-regarding-myocarditis-and https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availabi... Causing the stocks to slide when the link was made https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/vaccine-stocks-slide-as-fda-official-links-covid-vaccines-and-heart-conditions-in-young-men/ar-AA1RvBn1 https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/vaccine-stocks-slide-... With the mechanism probably understood now https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-vaccine-covid.html https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-v... Is the risk severe? No. But nothing that I saw removed suggested it was so, just higher in young men. The risk ended up being real, but they removed studies from universities and articles from hospitals/doctors, based on vibes from an administration, rather than science https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong-google-admits-to-censoring-covid-content-under-pressure-from-biden-administration/ https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/unacceptable-and-wrong... I was especially interested in it all because I lost significant use of my arm for 2 months after a too-deep injection. The concept of incorrect injections, like into the blood stream (an untested/unapproved method, prevented by aspiration which was not done/prevented, as policy), was interesting to me, which also was all removed.