3 ms·

Whereas traditional Democrats and Republicans are all protecting privacy? Thomas Massie is a wealthy libertarian and introduced a bill to protect privacy.

watwut 2mo ago
The millionaires libertarians consistently support republican party. They are the ones ahifting it to the right and towards fascism.
- inigyou 2mo ago
  Whoa whoa whoa whoa. You can't just call everyone you disagree with a fascist.
  - watwut 2mo ago
    I dont call "just anyone" I disagree with that. I call it a specific libertarian millionaires and republican party as is now. Because they fit the definition. And have fascist goals. I disagree with many other people who dont happen to be like that.
    - latency-guy2 2mo ago
      How do they fit the definition? What specific fascist goals? I don't have a strong bill into who you are or your expertise on the matter, so I have to question it, especially no credentials on the matter extending a "definitive answer" to the people involved.
      - watwut 2mo ago
        I read what they write. I see what they pust for. The millionaires were very open about their political goals, their distate for democracy. Republicans are very open about their wish to create white nationalist ethnotstate and their treatment of power is on full display. Do you also question those who pretend libertarian millionaires are all about freeedom? Or just take that as granted? Do you also question those who paint republicans in positive light where it is clear lie?
zetsurin 2mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_network https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_network, he's part of it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Massie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Massie, it's just protecting self interest by deregulation. recommend reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Money_(book) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Money_(book) there's a netflicks documentary by the same name that is NOT a substitute for the book.

watwut 2mo ago

The millionaires libertarians consistently support republican party. They are the ones ahifting it to the right and towards fascism.

inigyou 2mo ago
Whoa whoa whoa whoa. You can't just call everyone you disagree with a fascist.
- watwut 2mo ago
  I dont call "just anyone" I disagree with that. I call it a specific libertarian millionaires and republican party as is now. Because they fit the definition. And have fascist goals. I disagree with many other people who dont happen to be like that.
  - latency-guy2 2mo ago
    How do they fit the definition? What specific fascist goals? I don't have a strong bill into who you are or your expertise on the matter, so I have to question it, especially no credentials on the matter extending a "definitive answer" to the people involved.
    - watwut 2mo ago
      I read what they write. I see what they pust for. The millionaires were very open about their political goals, their distate for democracy. Republicans are very open about their wish to create white nationalist ethnotstate and their treatment of power is on full display. Do you also question those who pretend libertarian millionaires are all about freeedom? Or just take that as granted? Do you also question those who paint republicans in positive light where it is clear lie?

zetsurin 2mo ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_network https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_network, he's part of it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Massie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Massie, it's just protecting self interest by deregulation. recommend reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Money_(book) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Money_(book) there's a netflicks documentary by the same name that is NOT a substitute for the book.