>is more often built around legitimate reasoning taken to illegitimate extents and conclusions, than around outright fabrications. I don't disagree with you.

>is more often built around legitimate reasoning taken to illegitimate extents and conclusions, than around outright fabrications. I don't disagree with you. Whatever standard we choose I want it applied evenly to all subjects. A solid 60% of the "policy advocacy" type HN comments fall into this category.