3 ms·
I agree with the point that a prototype is not technology, but the problem is that the argument limits gen AI code to just prototyping. I also think prototyping
by jdw64 2mo ago
I agree with the point that a prototype is not technology, but the problem is that the argument limits gen AI code to just prototyping. I also think prototyping and production are different, but the boundary between what is a prototype and what is production is actually quite blurry.
That's not the core issue, though. The market itself is demanding heavy AI use, and GitHub has already reported a massive increase in repository creation. In other words, if we acknowledge that there are clearly users who want this GEN AI code, then we should be having a discussion about how to actually push that code into production
- imilev 2mo agoI see, I misinterpret what you are saying. I think manually written code is thing of the past. There will be need for it from time to time but we are going to operate at an even higher abstraction than we do now. Same is for things like asembly there are still people who need to edit that, but most of us are working with the higher-level programming languages.