> it's much more likely i'll get a faster accept than with a very large change. I do agree the above is true. And maybe it's just me, but it feels like I'm kin

> it's much more likely i'll get a faster accept than with a very large change. I do agree the above is true. And maybe it's just me, but it feels like I'm kind of cheating if I stack PRs to get a faster approval. Because when one reviews some dangling code without the context of how it's going to be wired in, they can't really tell what the blast radius will be and consequently what bar they should hold the code against (e.g. performance, security, etc). In these circumstances, usually the most one can do is raise some stylistic nits (which to be fair PR process often degrades into anyway) and move on.