3 ms·
> I use it but feel uncomfortable, that it has large attack surface and LLMs will find exploits in it Doesn't this apply to any application you use? How would
by k8sToGo 2mo ago
> I use it but feel uncomfortable, that it has large attack surface and LLMs will find exploits in it
Doesn't this apply to any application you use? How would it be different with plain wireguard?
- traceroute66 2mo ago> How would it be different with plain wireguard? Seriously ? You do realise that of all the security tools on the planet, plain wireguard most likely has the smallest attack surface of them all, right ? The problem here is as the other poster said. Tailscale is a security tool and yet the guys at Tailscale seem to be insistent on dumping everything INCLUDING the kitchen sink into it as a "feature". That sort of attitude is not going to end well. You end up with a large bloated code base, which equals large attack surface.
- k8sToGo 2mo agoI am talking especially about the LLM part. Also a kinder tone in your comments would be more appreciated.
- stonedivot 2mo ago[flagged]
- aborsy 2mo agoNo. If software is small enough, it can be proven. There is formal verification of the protocol and aspects of code: https://www.wireguard.com/formal-verification/ https://www.wireguard.com/formal-verification/ The code is small enough that can be reviewed.
- k8sToGo 2mo agoThat makes sense. Thanks!