7 ms·
i read the emphasized "human-written" part, in combination with that last line, as a blanket restriction (for contributing). but perhaps i read it wrong.
by john_strinlai 3mo ago
i read the emphasized "human-written" part, in combination with that last line, as a blanket restriction (for contributing). but perhaps i read it wrong.
- embedding-shape 3mo agoList of commits already include at least two contributors who are openly working with Claude on their code: https://github.com/yc-software/qm/commits/main/ https://github.com/yc-software/qm/commits/main/
- tptacek 3mo agoThe point is that they just want your prompts, not your code.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- john_strinlai 3mo agoyes, specifically they want purely human-written ones. i understand why they want their own agent to do the code, and i can see the reasoning behind it. but not allowing ai to format/tidy up/flesh out the proposal is the part that i thought was a little funny.
- tptacek 3mo agoIt's definitely a little bit funny. I think it's a good and interesting rule though!