4 ms·
It sounds like you’re proposing that individuals should have to pay court costs, in full so that the “taxpayer” doesn’t have to pay the bill
by jt2190 2mo ago
It sounds like you’re proposing that individuals should have to pay court costs, in full so that the “taxpayer” doesn’t have to pay the bill
- strictnein 2mo agoAs a wise man once said: > "There is, surprisingly enough, quite a chasm between identifying that some parties are taking advantage of a system and completely shutting that system down."
- jt2190 2mo agoYou repeating vague claims over and over is not clarifying your point at all.
- strictnein 2mo agoYou stated "The alternative would mean taking away the right of private citizens to sue". I stated that there is a large range of possibilities between the existing system and taking away a right to sue. You then repeated your earlier statement, in a slightly different form, so I just repeated mine. You keep going on about "individuals" when I'm clearly talking about trial lawyers looking to get rich, while we get $5 off our next meal at Taco Bell.