2 ms·
That's pretty much the proposal I've made for some years.[1] California has introduced bonding to telemarketing firms specifically. I feel that should apply a
by dredmorbius 2mo ago
That's pretty much the proposal I've made for some years.[1]
California has introduced bonding to telemarketing firms specifically. I feel that should apply at the carrier level, where networks carry a guaranteed bond, pay regular premiums on it, and are dinged for unwanted calls, with the proceeds being split among the called party and any third-party network(s) traversed by the calls. Downstream networks could seek compensation from ANY upstream network carrying the traffic regardless of whether or not they originated it.
This would both create a penalty for providing, or transiting, unsolicited calls, AND create an incentive for carriers / network providers themselves to pursue unsolicited traffic from their peers.
<https://oag.ca.gov/consumers/general/telreg https://oag.ca.gov/consumers/general/telreg>
________________________________
Notes:
1. See for example <https://toot.cat/@dredmorbius/111099306069523624 https://toot.cat/@dredmorbius/111099306069523624>
- inigyou 2mo agoDo you really want the network to be so locked down you can't get access to it?
- dredmorbius 2mo agoHow do you reach that conclusion based on what I've written?
- inigyou 2mo agoBecause it happened to everything else where this idea was tried.
- dredmorbius 2mo agoIn other words: nothing to do with what I'd written. And no specific instances or mechanisms detailed, to boot. Thanks.
- inigyou 2mo agoThe financial system. And the phone system in India.