That's arguable. Government officials working with third-parties to undermine Constitutional protections can be seen as (and is, in my opinion) attacking a stat

That's arguable. Government officials working with third-parties to undermine Constitutional protections can be seen as (and is, in my opinion) attacking a state authority to which one owes allegiance (i.e., the Constitution, which is the highest authority in the nation). Maybe the Flock c-suite isn't guilty of treason (although I think that's still arguable, as a layman) but every government official that has enabled these systems to violate our rights? Absolutely.