4 ms·
I'd agree with you then! I don't think that case was clearly laid out (or at least I didn't understand your argument to be as such). I'd also say that humans ar
by nadis 2mo ago
I'd agree with you then! I don't think that case was clearly laid out (or at least I didn't understand your argument to be as such). I'd also say that humans are historically quite bad at communicating intent (even if it comes more naturally and is communicated in natural-language), so I think tools that support human <> agent interaction and iteration are important.