3 ms·
No. You would not be “on the hook” for this as they implied. They are fearmongering. Even if a statute could somehow be stretched to cover it, it would be a nig
by iamnothere 3mo ago
No. You would not be “on the hook” for this as they implied. They are fearmongering. Even if a statute could somehow be stretched to cover it, it would be a nightmare to prosecute something like this. The media would jump all over it.
- inigyou 3mo agoThat's what I thought but I want to see their evidence that it happens.