2 ms·
From the 2025 Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence [1]: > The Office concludes that, given current generally available technology, prompts alone do
by cygx 2mo ago
From the 2025 Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence [1]:
> The Office concludes that, given current generally available technology, prompts alone do not provide sufficient human control to make users of an AI system the authors of the output. Prompts essentially function as instructions that convey unprotectible ideas. While
highly detailed prompts could contain the user’s desired expressive elements, at present they do not control how the AI system processes them in generating the output.
[1] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ https://www.copyright.gov/ai/
- dspillett 2mo agoAgain, that seems to be talking about fully AI generated work, like “works created solely by machines” from the previous document, not AI-aided work. It is only stating that the prompt is not considered sufficient human work because it comes before the generation process, but it says nothing of subsequent editing of combining with other stuff.
- cygx 2mo agoIn the absence of more specific legislation or court decisions, the same rules that cover usage of any other public domain code would apply.