> WAY too surface-level and "both sides-y" IMHO this is an indicator that they are doing a great job. The opposite being "extremely niche and biased". I don't

> WAY too surface-level and "both sides-y" IMHO this is an indicator that they are doing a great job. The opposite being "extremely niche and biased". I don't need to know the deep inner workings of India's goings on, and especially don't need my first introduction to it being profoundly myopic and spun. Which is what I find the Economist to be guilty of. Give me surface level and neutral.