4 ms·
Huh? Maybe a third scenario is that AI helped fix the bugs? Like described in the actual post you are replying to? This level of conspiracy theory is getting a
by simianwords 3mo ago
Huh? Maybe a third scenario is that AI helped fix the bugs? Like described in the actual post you are replying to? This level of conspiracy theory is getting a bit ridiculous.
- IanCal 3mo agoI think you’re right, my base assumption is that the models can code and can fix bugs, and can code more in parallel and faster than humans at a lower cost. If Google are tackling lower value bugs with AI the number is in a way inflated compared to some utility measure (fixing a smaller number of worse bugs could be preferable) but it’s still things fixed.
- tstrimple 3mo agoThere's no reasoning with the folks who are anti-ai and claim LLM's cannot produce anything worthwhile. They are basically flat-earthers or anti-vaxxers at this point. There is literally no amount of evidence that will convince them. They will always say that LLMs cannot produce anything but garbage just like the anti-vaxxers who state vaccines just cause autism. They are both fucking morons who no one with any grip on reality should indulge.