3 ms·
Another comment got downvoted for raising this, but I found it interesting that pangram flags large parts of this blog post as AI generated ( https://www.pangra
by Recursing 2mo ago
Another comment got downvoted for raising this, but I found it interesting that pangram flags large parts of this blog post as AI generated ( https://www.pangram.com/history/b82cdbf4-bdbc-46ea-8315-bd43d6fe81b9 https://www.pangram.com/history/b82cdbf4-bdbc-46ea-8315-bd43... ), while earendil denies it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119957 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119957
- the_mitsuhiko 2mo agoThe post for the most part is mine, so if something AI generated slipped into it it's on me. I can share with you what I did to write the article which I do for most of my writing. I start out with what I want to talk about, and then make an initial draft. In this case I also had Sol research all current APIs so I don't have blind spots. I tend to also talk with an AI to see if the structure structure of the post makes sense. I then wrote all sections by hand but used Sol to fix up typos, grammar and punctuation. I also had Sol apply notes and patches that were provided via Discord. If I find the earlier drafts I can check if it did some more outrageous edits, but I kinda doubt it did. I do know that my workflow of having an LLM to fixes up later is increasingly breaking on SOTA models and I have complained about this before. Normally I now carefully apply fixes that it proposes, but in this case I didn't due to time constraints. I am curious though why it claims that this is AI generated.