4 ms·
We almost need a proof of human check. Before submitting a PR, you must find and paste the actual lyrics of a random song as challenge-response. Lyrics seem to
by dannyw 3mo ago
We almost need a proof of human check. Before submitting a PR, you must find and paste the actual lyrics of a random song as challenge-response.
Lyrics seem to have the strongest safeguards out of everything. (Try it! On some APIs, you might see moderation/refusal behavior you don't see with anything else, even cyber)
- lenkite 3mo agoPR human captcha for every commit pushed to a PR ?
- netdevphoenix 3mo agoBasically, any copyrighted material should do. This only covers not ablated LLMs though. Ultimately, a web of trust where someone whose humanity and integrity you trust AT THE COST OF YOUR OWN INTEGRITY vouches for an individual is likely going to be the most reliable way. New open source contributors will require proof of humanity. On top of this, you would want an expirable proof of humanity to reduce account takeover as a security vector and publicly sharing failed proof attempts would quickly deter actors from targeting projects en masse.
- sdsd 3mo ago>Basically, any copyrighted material should do. Anything illegal, for that matter. Crime as proof of humanity. Fun future!
- inigyou 3mo agoOn the one hand, yes. On the other hand, I don't want to be constantly worried about my own reputation.
- netdevphoenix 3mo ago> I don't want to be constantly worried about my own reputation. That is why you must think carefully who you vouch for. Like in a house party. If you bring someone who does not act well, it reflects bad on you. Ultimately, a shrinking contributor pool is the inevitable consequence of code generation being virtually free.
- inigyou 3mo agoBut then I end up not vouching for anyone.
- netdevphoenix 3mo agoAnd that's fine. Not everyone has someone to vouch for.
- inigyou 3mo agoWhat is the advantage of vouching - or can it only harm you? How many people do you envision the average person vouching for? If it's less than 3, that's a problem.
- wang_li 3mo agoThe reason you vouch for someone is that you get the benefit of their contributions to the project and, assuming the person you are recommending is good, you get an improved reputation in the eyes of the person you vouchsafed them to.
- ClikeX 3mo agoVouching for people is not a new concept, right? We do it all the time.
- inigyou 3mo agoIt usually ends with you getting banned or shadowbanned from vouching.
- matheusmoreira 3mo agoHope the Programa Nostra will open the books for me in the future.
- inigyou 3mo agoYou can also ask it to say racial slurs.
- jandrese 3mo agoYou're just going to force contributors to use Grok.
- 20k 3mo agoSong lyrics have the strongest legal precedent is why, there was a recent court case requiring them to be taken out of the training data of an AI model
- ClikeX 3mo agoProof of humanity must be dead dropped at a McDonalds within 25 miles of a legit contributor to verify.