3 ms·
This is what I've seen. There has been a middle-ground though, that I've seen. I was using Jetbrains' AI Assistant, or whatever it's called, during an interview
by t-writescode 2mo ago
This is what I've seen. There has been a middle-ground though, that I've seen. I was using Jetbrains' AI Assistant, or whatever it's called, during an interview for the (nearly) first time, and I only used it as auto-complete, but it was consistently, surprisingly, very accurate. I literally did write it faster. I scanned the literal next line, in the context of what I was writing, with all that context in my brain, and I saw what it wrote and went "yeah, that looks good". I'm a very fast typist (~> 100 wpm) and I still found it beneficial for writing out work fast. Further, since everything is still in my mental context and I can evaluate it at the same time, I feel like I can trust that type of code more.
But maybe that's just me.
- stephenr 2mo agoHow long ago was this? I tried their "local ai autocomplete" thing a few years ago for a little while and it was hot garbage. It guessed the right/acceptable completion about 30% of the time at best. I haven't looked at it since.
- t-writescode 2mo agoWithin the last, like, ... 3 months, I think.