3 ms·
You can literally read their thoughts if you run an open model, they look like pretty human thoughts to me, albeit a neurotic human.
by logicchains 2mo ago
You can literally read their thoughts if you run an open model, they look like pretty human thoughts to me, albeit a neurotic human.
- JohnMakin 2mo agoThese aren't thoughts how humans literally think them. I can write a program to produce a string that looks like human thinking, is it human thinking? Of course it isn't. It's such a silly comparison.
- infinite_spin 2mo ago> aren't remotely comparable to the way humans think and act Neural networks in machine learning/AI are comparable to neural networks in human brains. What made you think they aren't?
- gowld 2mo agoThat's an incredibly deep misunderstanding. Almost as bad as saying that human is the same as a tree because we're both made of carbohydrates and proteins.
- infinite_spin 2mo agoThe comparison I provided is between how an LLM functions and one part of how a brain functions. It's not an equivalence, I did not say they are "the same". You made the claim that these systems "aren't remotely comparable", and when faced with a clear comparison, you claim "deep misunderstanding".. Have you any arguments to make, or is this going to devolve into more statements that both mischaracterize and muddy the water?
- anonymars 2mo agoNot to disagree with the overall point, but in fairness you are responding to a different person from the one that made the original claim