12 ms·

"too cheap to meter" and Luna is still more expensive than deepseek-v4 pro

• jrflo 2mo ago
  It's marketing hyperbole, but Luna is more intelligent per dollar than deepseek-v4 pro. Cost means nothing without the associated capability
  • efficax 2mo ago
    is it? i don't know how we measure these things, but here's one measurement that says v4 pro is better than luna: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/gpt-5-6-luna-medium-vs-deepseek-v4-pro https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/gpt-5-6-lun... presumably it's a much bigger model
    • energy123 2mo ago
      This has already been updated with the new prices?
      • pornel 2mo ago
        The intelligence scores are absolute, not per $. DeepSeek Pro is more capable than Luna regardless of the cost.
        • energy123 2mo ago
          There's also a cost graph on the same page and the context of this conversation is cost vs performance frontier.
    • lemming 2mo ago
      That’s comparing Luna on medium thinking with Deepseek on max. If you switch Luna to xhigh in that comparison it’s considerably more capable while still also cheaper.
    • jmolinski 2mo ago
      You are comparing Luna medium to Deepseek Max, when you switch to Luna high it's cheaper per task than DS and has a better intelligence score, which goes higher yet on xhigh and max reasoning levels. https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/gpt-5-6-luna-high-vs-deepseek-v4-pro https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/gpt-5-6-lun...