3 ms·
Let's suppose each models was subsidized at 70%, so that we only pay 30% of the cost. They would loose much more money per token on the more powerful models. It
by heisgone 2mo ago
Let's suppose each models was subsidized at 70%, so that we only pay 30% of the cost. They would loose much more money per token on the more powerful models. It's in their interest to encourage the use of the less expensive models. Let's say they increase Luna subsidies at 90%. They would still "save" relative to the use of the more expensive models.
- anthonypasq 2mo ago> Let's suppose each models was subsidized at 70%, so that we only pay 30% of the cost. why on earth would you suppose that?
- oblio 2mo agoBecause their leaked financials point that way.
- gruez 2mo agoSource?
- oblio 2mo agohttps://www.wheresyoured.at/exclusive-openai-financials/ https://www.wheresyoured.at/exclusive-openai-financials/
- beering 2mo agoThe company losing money does not mean the model inference in API is 70% subsidized- that’s a crazy leap in logic. Obviously the massive number of free chatgpt users are getting subsidized 100%.
- mgambati 2mo agoNot true at all. Do you really believe that generating 1m output tokens on sol really cost 100 usd? These companies are printing money on inference. The only issue is the capex of expending on new servers but they are generating TONS of income.