> And this is exactly how things in large corporations don't happen. Things in large corporations who pay so well that nobody makes it through the recruitment f

> And this is exactly how things in large corporations don't happen. Things in large corporations who pay so well that nobody makes it through the recruitment filters and competition who's more than 2% off from being a pure assessment metrics maximiser. In my mind, chasing an idea like this just does not match the type. What's your evidence for any of this? I worked for Google and a lot of other large companies, and recruitment does not work like this at all. If you want to blame the big companies, you should maybe say that people don't get time to chase these things. Google's 20% time was famously nicknamed 120% time, after all. (The joke being that you can get your 20% time, if you put it on top of your 100% working hours.)