3 ms·
Honestly, I wouldn't be opposed to that either. If we're protecting kids, we should also protect the old and feeble. Old people, people with developmental handi
by jeroenhd 3mo ago
Honestly, I wouldn't be opposed to that either. If we're protecting kids, we should also protect the old and feeble. Old people, people with developmental handicaps, you name it: they're being exposed to a world that can and will abuse you if you have any faith in humanity left and don't have the technical skills to identify things like fake domains and scam sites.
For some reason we're making sure no 12 year old can drive or run for any government positions, but a 90 year old can keep the driver's license that they've had since before the start of colour television, or make critical decisions affecting millions. We can't have it both ways.
- kova12 3mo agoIt would be hilarious when some services become unavailable to 55+. The whole age check scam will dissolve in a heartbeat
- lII1lIlI11ll 3mo agoNot necessary. People who still transfer their life savings to some "I'm with MicroSoft tech support" guy shouldn't be allowed to vote either TBH.
- ColdStream 3mo agoMaybe we should push that then, don't go around the problem but head face first into it. Force the bottom of the bucket to blow out.
- xg15 3mo agoWaiting for the first 90 year old president...
- ColdStream 3mo agoWell Donny T is working on it but as the saying goes, if you want the gods to laugh - tell them your plans.