4 ms·
Yeah that makes sense. I took the optimizations of my hamming distance library to a bit of an insane level. I wrote this about the first round https://emschwart
by emschwartz 2mo ago
Yeah that makes sense. I took the optimizations of my hamming distance library to a bit of an insane level. I wrote this about the first round https://emschwartz.me/unnecessary-optimization-in-rust-hamming-distances-simd-and-auto-vectorization/ https://emschwartz.me/unnecessary-optimization-in-rust-hammi... The second round brought the best result down to 0.8 nanoseconds per comparison on x86 with SIMD (for a batch of 1000).
Separately, I’m a huge fan of your writing about search! It’s been very helpful while I’ve been building https://scour.ing https://scour.ing.
- softwaredoug 2mo agoThank you! <3