5 ms·
Redesigned MIT OCW Website
- rjv 14y agoNot a big fan, honestly. It looks like it was designed in 2006. This could definitely benefit from less striped backgrounds and more whitespace.
- bronxbomber92 14y agoIt is so much more functional though. Navigation and discovery is heaps better now.
- rileyt 14y agoThe functionality is definitely better, but I would have to agree, the design needs some serious help. It has become pretty clear lately that people don't like using ugly websites, even if they work better than their pretty counterparts...
- primatology 14y agoSure, it's not a gorgeous next-gen startupesque web design, but I think it's more than visually appealing enough.
- bronxbomber92 14y agoI agree with primatology; it is not ugly. Maybe not a shining perl, but it is easy on the eyes.
- rileyt 14y agoI think something with much more whitespace and less stripes and unnecessary colors would be much easier on the eyes.
- mayneack 14y agoThing I'm most happy about is the upgraded export course materials. The zipped file is now logically organized. They used to have seemingly random arbitrary grouping of materials in folders with half of the directories only leading to one subdirectory.
- simonz05 14y agoMain navigation doesn't work in Chromium Version 23.0.1271.91 (167501) due to a floating error. "Featured Sites" doesn't fit on the nav.
- hexis 14y agoAside from the web design, they use a weird term in the copy: "Self Learner". I know what it means, but boy is it awkward.
- acremades 14y agoI agree here with some of the comments. It needs a little bit of work on the front end.
- syassami 14y agoMobile layouts or an app would be really nice for on the go purposes.