4 ms·
Sometimes I'm really baffled by the dominance of American date formats instead of clear, natural and sortable ISO 8601. YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.ffffff+ZZZZ
by przemoc 14y ago
Sometimes I'm really baffled by the dominance of American date formats instead of clear, natural and sortable ISO 8601.
YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.ffffff+ZZZZ
- dasil003 14y agoI used to think the same way until I moved to the UK and people expressed the opinion that YYYY-MM-DD is still an American format. I guess because for them the day always comes before month. Nevertheless, ISO 8601 is clearly the ideal format for its sortability and consistency, cultural imperialism be damned!
- przemoc 14y agoWell, in Poland we do use D.[M]M.[YY]YY too, which is unfortunately quite popular, as a short version of the format with verbal month "D MMMMM YYYY r." (r. stands for "rok[u]", i.e. year). This long version is predominantly used in lots of official forms and letters here.
- btilly 14y agoHeh. At a previous job I advocated that format so much that people thought it was a Canadian format. They were quite surprised when I told them the actual format that was used in Canada.
- stordoff 14y agoFor anything handwritten (cheques, dates on signatures etc.), I use YYYY-Mmm-DD (e.g. 2012-Jan-10), as I can't imagine anyone confusing the meaning of it. I avoid DD-MM-YYYY and MM-DD-YYYY, as I usually end up having to check what I meant. No one has commented on it yet. Typed, I use YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. 2012-01-10), mainly for its sortability.